On Tue, November 15, 2005 11:35 am, Richard Davey wrote: > Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 4:34:28 PM, you wrote: >> so how many people actually _need_ to write portable code? ok so >> many you are starting a project which will become a runaway success >> but until it starts receiving alot of attention use of >> short-open-tags is probably not your biggest issue either. > > heh :) I have to admit I was thinking the same thing. I use short-tags > and always enable them, I specifically like the <?=$blah alias. > > I cannot see any more security risks from allowing <? as from allowing > <?php. If you're letting direct PHP code injection into your scripts, > then you've got bigger things to worry about than if the hacker will > use a short-tag or not! I don't really mind about <? versus <?php, cuz I can cope either way. I even find <?php a bit more readable, for some reason. But I sure wish <?= would work even without short_tags on. As I understand it, <? needed to go away because of XHTML, no? But is <?= a valid beginning for XML/XHTML? If not, why did it get lumped in with short_tags? [shrug] -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
