>-----Original Message----- >From: Richard Lynch [mailto:ceo@xxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 5:11 PM >To: Torgny Bjers >Cc: php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: fckeditor and PDF and pesky users > >On Mon, October 17, 2005 3:56 pm, Torgny Bjers wrote: >> Also, when using <iframe/> you are weeding out those old browsers that > >If somebody else wants to weed out old browsers, that's all fine and good, but that's not me... > >> Besides, if this is for an editor interface, for a specific client, >> one could reasonably demand that they use at least one of the newer >> browsers such as IE5+ or Mozilla. If not for a specific client, or >> subset of clients, but for a general update of an entire application >> that is open sourced, I agree with Jasper, don't touch it. :) > >I personally don't think I should demand editors use a specific browser. > >I believe in customer choice. > >For that matter, *I* probably don't use a browser that does this right, being as I'm usually on Linux, almost always on Netscape, and very very very >rarely do PDF and/or Flash work really right for me. > >And you know what? > >I very very very seldom care badly enough about any of the content I'm "missing" and when I do care enough to go get it, I'm disappointed by the content >more often than I'm pleased that I took that effort. > >Again, this is obviously MY weird world-view at work here. :-) > >-- >Like Music? >http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm > >-- >PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > Not that you'd want to use a deprecated tag, but using an embed tag with a src value pointing to a PDF file (with appropriate height/width) will render the entire Adobe plugin with toolbars and all directly in the page, as demonstrated here: http://www.cstv.com/auto_pdf/p_hotos/s_chools/osu/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/w eekly-release Jason Karns -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
