On 24 June 2005 15:03, Jason Barnett wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > ... > > > > > > There's a difference between a reference to a reference and a copy > > of a reference *hehehe*. > > > > Cheers, > > Rob. > > Dear diary: jackpot! > > Now that makes sense. And am I correctly filling in the > blanks when I > guess that $foo3 = $aObj is merely copying the reference instead of > referencing the reference? I probably could have written that more > clearly, but I think you get what I'm saying. When the new PHP 5 behaviour was first being touted around, I remember it being explained that PHP 5 would use object _handles_ where PHP4 used the objects themselves. This is sort of analogous to (database) resource handles, or file handles, where what you get is a proxy for the actual thing. So Rob's statement would end up talking about a reference to a handle and a copy of a handle, which may help to make more sense out of what's going on! Cheers! Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser, Learning Support Services, Learning & Information Services, JG125, James Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University, Headingley Campus, LEEDS, LS6 3QS, United Kingdom Email: m.ford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel: +44 113 283 2600 extn 4730 Fax: +44 113 283 3211 To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
