Hmm.. If PDFs are always 72dpi.. Then the OP would in other words need to resize the PDF document (and everything on it) to 200/72 times the normal size, and then the printer would print it correct? Hmm.. Isn't that pretty much exactly what Richard Lynch said? Seems like a kinda ugly solution to me, but it might be the way to go.. :p -- // DvDmanDT MSN: dvdmandt¤hotmail.com Mail: dvdmandt¤telia.com "Richard Lynch" <ceo@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet news:2267.66.99.91.45.1106779485.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > DvDmanDT wrote: > > Take a quick look at imagecopyresampled.. It can change the size of an > > image > > pretty good.. Now I know nothing about PDFs really.. But I suppose you > > could > > just scale it with the GD functions then place the result in a PDF.. Maybe > > the PDF functions can scale as well though.. Although, try both, because > > chances are the PDF functions will resize instead of resample, and > > resampling gives a MUCH nicer result in most cases.. > > In my experience, the libPDF just embeds the full picture in the document, > and lets the printer/renderer worry about the dpi... > > So if you put a 300-dpi image in a PDF (72-dpi) scaled at 1.0 and print > it, the image still comes out 300-dpi. > > If you scale the image to 2.0, you get a 150-dpi image (or whatever it > works out to) to get that image in that much space. > > There may be ways to change this, or maybe I was mis-interpreting what I > saw in my PDFs on my printer, but that's what it seemed like to me. > > -- > Like Music? > http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
