Paul,
Thank you for the response. Unfortunately, changing the include to:
include("../extension.inc");
Produces the exact same result:
Warning: include(../extension.inc) [function.include]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/bu/jsantana/htdocs/php/IncludeExample.php on line 3
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '../extension.inc' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/php5/lib/php') in /home/bu/jsantana/htdocs/php/IncludeExample.php on line 3
Thank you for the .inc.php advice. I am not the programmer here but will pass that information on to him.
Jesse
Jesse Santana
Project Lead - Enterprise Services Group
Information Technology Services
California State University, Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Long Beach, CA 90840
Office: (562)985-8511
Fax: (562)985-8855
Paul Blondé <jpb@xxxxxxxx>
08/10/2007 11:18 AM |
|
I believe the notation "./../" is illegal, perhaps either the new PHP or the new Solaris is probably now enforcing that when the old did not?
I would recommend dropping the leading "./" (since it just means "start from the current directory" anyway), and trying it with just "../extension.inc"
I would also recommend not using .inc as a suffix, as anyone with half a brain could view the source code by just typing in www.whatever.com/allmydatabasepasswords.inc or something similar, telling Apache to deliver it as text. Following the practice of double-suffixing all include files like so: "myphpcodefile.inc.php" will indicate that the file is an include file while still forcing Apache to send the file through the php preprocessor before displaying it, rendering the user unable to directly view the source code in your include files.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Paul Blondé
Web Programmer
enTel Communications Inc
jpb@xxxxxxxx
250.633.5151
866.633.2644
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Santana [mailto:jsantana@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:54 AM
To: php-install@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
Maybe someone can shed some light on this problem for me. Our current production server is a Solaris 9 machine running Apache 1.3.37 and PHP 4.4.2. The following script works perfectly on this machine:
<?php
include("./../extension.inc");
echo "<BR>";
echo "Hello World!";
?>
The new server we are setting up is running Solaris 10, Apache 2.2.4 and PHP 5.2.3. The same script I mentioned above produces this error:
Warning: include(./../extension.inc) [function.include]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/bu/jsantana/htdocs/php/IncludeExample.php on line 3
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening './../extension.inc' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/php5/lib/php') in /home/bu/jsantana/htdocs/php/IncludeExample.php on line 3
Hello World!
If I define my include path as include("/home/bu/jsantana/htdocs/extension.inc");, the script works fine with PHP 5. Can anyone explain why under PHP 5 the ./../ does not back up one directory from the directory where I call my script from?
Thank you,
Jesse
Jesse Santana
Project Lead - Enterprise Services Group
Information Technology Services
California State University, Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Long Beach, CA 90840
Office: (562)985-8511
Fax: (562)985-8855
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
- From: Matthew Marino
- Re: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
- Prev by Date: RE: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
- Next by Date: Re: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
- Previous by thread: RE: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
- Next by thread: Re: PHP v4 vs. PHP v5 behavior
- Index(es):