Interesting thoughts and discussion. Even in areas of photography most dependent on more sophisticated technology, the “production values” have increased dramatically in recent years as the technology has become more accessible; available and relatively affordable. For example, we’re seeing an explosion of high quality astrophotography, with the availability of numerous sophisticated, dedicated cameras and a wide variety of high quality optics, automation, telescope mounts, control devices, software, etc. It’s now not that hard to get what I might describe as “Hubble quality” (qualitatively, though still nowhere near the same resolution) astrophotos from most back yards, albeit with the investment of several thousand dollars and the time and effort to understand how to use it. Seems like it used to be, a number of decades ago (back when I got into astronomy and photography) amateurs might get interested in astronomy and photography and get inspired to try taking photos through their telescopes (which was pretty challenging back in those film days). Nowadays I think folks see lots of nice astrophotos online and think, “hey, I can do that.” They seem to know more about the equipment than what they are photographing. Not that there’s anything wrong with that — just an observation. Zolt Levay On Jul 6, 2021, at 3:23 PM, andpph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
|