Did you compensate for the filter at all in exposure?
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think your red filter photograph was slightly overexposed which would account for results I believe.
AndyD
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 7:16 AM, Kostas Papakotas <clenchedteethphotography@yahoo.gr > wrote:
>
> I just had a scan made of 2 rolls of B&W film that i shot in a fortress/city. (with No corrections in a color minilab)
> Where it was applicable I shot both with and without a red filter.
> What surprised me was that in the red filter frames, both the vegetation and the rock walls turned out lighter than I thought they would.
> Sample photo at: https://img.aspr.gr/images/2017/11/15/Redfilter-Combo.jpg
> Does that stand to reason?
>
> Or is it a metering issue?
> (my process was to meter the sky and walls separately, then average. Which usually turned out to use the wall metering at 0 to -1 stop. I did not meter again with the red filter, i just kept the no-filter stop down)
