Don't throw the baby out with the bath water

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I own an Epson 4900 and it is one of Dan’s Type 2 printers. 

I think a refurb is about $1500 these days, and if you go look online, one can find the manual and the initial charge software. Initial charging will clean out the heads nicely with $35/cart compatible inks rather than Epsons at $90, and now that I’ve done that the printer works as if new. The initial charge software only runs on a PC, so I borrow one when needed.

‘High end printers’ can be found at B&H or Amazon - just rank them by price downwards from most expensive, not most popular. 

Jan

On Mar 17, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Could you name some high end type 1 printers?

On Mar 17, 2015 2:06 PM, "Dan Mitchell" <danmdan3842@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The printer you buy, and the ink you use depends on how often you need to use the printer.

There are 2 distinct types of printer - one (1) has the heads/jets integral with the ink tanks, while the other (2) has non-removable heads/jets as a fixed part of the printer plus use simple ink-tank(s).

With a type 1 printer you can use after-market ink, since the heads/jets are changed with the cartridge, so if an ink jet gets unclearably blocked all you need to do is replace the ink cartridge.  However with a type 2 printer an unclearable printing jet (nozzle or whatever it is called) means an expensive service charge to dissemble the printer and clean the captive heads; sometimes it spells death to that printer.

I left a type 2 Epson unused for a few months and it never was able to work again, no amount of head cleaning freed the gummed-up jets, and the service cost was higher than the cost of a new one.  So now I always buy a  type 1 printer as I seldom do much color printing these days, partly due to the excessive ink costs.  And thus one answer to the O.P. is if you have a type 2 printer it is perhaps best to use only the maker’s inks as hopefully they are less likely to clog the printing heads.





> On 17 Mar 2015, at 11:00, photoforum-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1.  printer ink (Bob)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:29 -0400
> From: Bob <w8imo@xxxxxxxx>
> To: PhotoForum educational network <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: printer ink
> Message-ID: <55078C25.10208@xxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> My Canon Pro 9000 died and I bought Pro 9000 MkII.  When I had my first
> Canon photo printer the print head died and the guy at the service shop
> told me to use Canon ink.  He was very serious to the point that he
> replaced my aftermarket in with Canon ink at no charge.  Havin been in
> computer service for forty years and being used to using "our" ink I
> only used Canon ink in the Pro 9000.
>
> Has anyone had experiences, good or bad, with aftermarket ink?
>



Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Art for Cars: art4carz.com
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post

.






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux