I agree. It seems as if there are at least two things being discussed but being conflated with each other. Simply stated, it looks like variance in total light transmitted as a function of aperture and leaf shutter speed. And, the other is the correct amount of light to illuminate the negative in order to attain 'correct' exposure and what 'correct' exposure means. While interesting, perhaps it is time to move on. James CPAP Therapy is a way to live. > On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Folks, > > We seem to be talking apples and oranges here … or apples and pears since they are almost the same but not. > Probably best to discontinue the discussion as we are not on the same "wavelength" as they used to say in the 60's! > > cheerio, > > Andy >
