But she didn't want an
image, she wanted a photograph. Since she was "the boss" the pj
went back and got "the photograph" Bob On 1/25/2014 7:19 PM, Andrew Sharpe
wrote:
Heh. So much for photojournalism. In fact, the photographer was there, so a photojournalist *editor* should have accepted that one. Andrew On 1/25/14, 3:46 PM, Bob wrote:Some time ago we had a Photo Editor from the local newspaper speak at a camera club meeting. When Photoshop came up she told us about a shot one of the pjs took at the local annual air show, The photo showed the pj reflected in the pilots helmet. the pj said he could remove that with Photoshop. She told him that was not the way it worked. She sent him back to get the shot without the reflection. She explained that there is a difference between a photograph and a Potoshopped IMAGE. Bob On 1/25/2014 5:25 PM, John Palcewski wrote:The Associated Press Is Not 'Vogue,' Fired Photoshopping Photographer Learns "Digitally altering photographs might be accepted -- expected, really -- when it comes to magazines like Vogue, but it's a big no-no when it comes to news organizations. Yet that's what one Pulitzer-winning AP photographer chose to do to a photo he took in Syria in September." Full story here: http://bit.ly/1enSYZO-- Never trust atoms..... They make up everything. --
Never trust atoms..... They make up everything. |