Heh. So much for photojournalism. In fact, the photographer was there, so a photojournalist *editor* should have accepted that one. Andrew On 1/25/14, 3:46 PM, Bob wrote: > Some time ago we had a Photo Editor from the local newspaper speak at a > camera club meeting. > > When Photoshop came up she told us about a shot one of the pjs took at > the local annual air show, The photo showed the pj reflected in the > pilots helmet. the pj said he could remove that with Photoshop. She > told him that was not the way it worked. She sent him back to get the > shot without the reflection. > > She explained that there is a difference between a photograph and a > Potoshopped IMAGE. > > Bob > On 1/25/2014 5:25 PM, John Palcewski wrote: >> >> The Associated Press Is Not 'Vogue,' Fired Photoshopping Photographer >> Learns >> >> "Digitally altering photographs might be accepted -- expected, really >> -- when it comes to magazines like Vogue, but it's a big no-no when it >> comes to news organizations. Yet that's what one Pulitzer-winning AP >> photographer chose to do to a photo he took in Syria in September." >> >> Full story here: >> >> http://bit.ly/1enSYZO >> > > -- > Never trust atoms..... They make up everything.
