Of course, I meant "does NOT preclude it from being art". Sorry for the typo. Andrew On 1/23/14, 1:14 PM, asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > My definition of art is much broader. It is based simply on intent. If > something is produced with the intention of it being art, it is art. > > I may not like it, or even be disgusted or offended by it, but it does > preclude it from being art. > > Andrew > >