Yeah when ever I see those kind of statements about art and photography I just point to Duchamp and say READ.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Guess I’ll have to change my biog and not tell people I am an artist any more. I’ve been asking my agents, dealers, galleries, and others for years if I am shooting art or commerce and nobody has ever said I am a commercial artist unless it’s a shot of a beer bottle or a truck. Even then I try to make the product look like art. I had to, as mostly the ‘art directors’ had something else in mind.On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Randy Little wrote:Yeah pretty crazy statement no?
On Jan 22, 2014 12:37 PM, "Klaus Knuth" <klausknuth@xxxxxxx> wrote:Randy,This was in response to Dan Mitchell’s earlier comment:"At this link are one of the very very few places where I would say that art and photography really meet."
On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Klaus I don't like that term Where art and photography meet. Its to me like saying its a place where paint and art met. I have seen this put a person in a painting gag for what pushing 100 years now. Some one just has good PR.On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Klaus Knuth <klausknuth@xxxxxxx> wrote:I think this is easily another place (where art and photography meet) - just modern art and not the old masters.KlausOn Jan 22, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:http://www.phaidon.com/agenda/photography/articles/2014/january/21/david-lachapelle-takes-on-big-oil/?utm_source=cheetah&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NL210114
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Art for Cars: art4carz.comStills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Art for Cars: art4carz.comStills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.
