Huh? As if "professional" criteria never change?
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I love when people use factual definitive to describe subjective interpretations.On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Emily L. Ferguson <elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:At 12:04 AM -0800 1/12/14, Gregory wrote:Claustrophobia, sorry. Not particularly interested in scholarly definitions, or the latest fad. Just how the image makes me feel. Not enough data on the top. Doesn't need much more, but, sorry. It's too close.
My problem is when a critique echoes another. The tightness at the top was intentional. One doesn't need any more information in that respect.
