Re: 1900s Antarctica Photos Found

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wait, are Randy and Jan actually *agreeing* to something here?

Andrew


On 12/31/13, 9:57 AM, Jan Faul wrote:
> 
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Randy Little wrote:
> 
>> Yes.   the SD card would have held up better.   You would only need to
>> know the pinout.  It might take some time vs just having a neg but if
>> these had been Color film they would be totally clear at this point.  
>> You aren't going to find any E process film in 100 years and see much
>> unless its been properly stored in archival conditions.  
> 
> MY Dad’s Kodachromes look great after 50 years, but his E film all
> sucks. Especially the Ansco and other crap look awful. Here he was being
> a scientist and knowing what KII was and then he’d slip in a few rolls
> of Ansco or other rubbish and today that stuff looks pink. The stuff to
> go with E film will be all the Kodacolor films. Some of mine is starting
> to look more faded than a pair of well worn Levis and it is in archival
> sleeves and boxes in cool storage at 52ªF. 
> 
> 
> Art Faul
> 
> The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
> ------
> Art for Cars: art4carz.com <http://art4carz.com>
> Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
> Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com
> Camera Works - The Washington Post
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm
> ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/
> 
> .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux