Re: Speak, Memory! a different take

[MichaelHughes7A@xxxxxxx]

Memories and photos complement one another.  How many people see the lamp post or telegraph pole sticking out of their subjects head before they look at the completed photograph. When they do the more fortunate ones look more carefully next time.

 

Rather less obviously one sometimes sees reflections in a photograph that you did not notice when you operated the shutter. 

 

However I write as a mere mortal who happens to have a camera.

 

Michael in Norwich

 

In a message dated 11/12/2013 23:33:07 GMT Standard Time, rnuuja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

If you take photos of things that you aren't actually interested in then you won't bother to remember them.

If it is something you are interested in, you will likely review the photos that you took and enhance your memory.

Sent from my mobile.

On Dec 11, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Pablo Coronel <pablo.coronel.70@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Are you suggesting all thos japanese tourist form the 80s and 90s do not rememeber much?

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Paladin <ranflory@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

While the quotes from the article by Ben Richmond certainly come directly from the article, they are misleading and serve only to mislead. They do not accurately reflect the entire findings of the article, and they do not reflect the conclusions from the original article by Linda Henkel.

 

In the first place, the study conditions were flawed, in that subjects were taken through a museum and asked to “take note” by either photographing an object or simply observing it.

 

In other words, the subjects were asked to either focus on observation or focus on photography.

 

The results from this study were inevitable.

 

Richmond, however,  continues to emphasize his personal anti-camera agenda with other misleading statements

 

In her article abstract, Henkel states:

However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on.

 

Read how Richmond restates this sentence. He changes the meaning to suit his personal bias. (To his credit, Richmond does indicate his bias several times, including in his last paragraph where he states, “[This] isn’t the ‘cameras are ruining your brain’ hit piece of research I was sort of hoping for.”

 

Although I disagree with several aspects of Henkel’s original research design, her conclusions are well thought out. Read her abstract at http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/04/0956797613504438.abstract to find out her actual conclusions. I think you will find that the actual take home lesson from the article is: take LOTS of pictures, but review them when you get home, or something like that.

 

Peace,

 

rand

-------------------------------------------------

"If you want to make a memory, start by forgetting your camera. Two new studies published in Psychological Science found that people who took pictures of objects had more trouble remembering specific details about them, where they were situated, and even if they had seen them at all.

"When people rely on technology to remember for them—counting on the camera to record the event and thus not needing to attend to it fully themselves—it can have a negative impact on how well they remember their experiences..."

Whole article here:

http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/taking-photos-makes-your-memory-worse

=