Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Little
Sent: Sep 1, 2013 5:26 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: ilford positive paper3 or something. BUT I AM TRYING to be cool or I would just use my Wisner 8x10 sheesh. No of course film but paper, Man paper is like Instagram but without and iphone. Crazy I know.
Does anyone own a Harman Titan camera?On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:For my money, I would shoot Tri-X. At f288, you’re looking at some very long exposures even with Tri-X. Their direct positive is very slow by comparison. I haven’t used it in some time but I think it ah an ISO of 8.On Sep 1, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Randy Little wrote:Yes Jan ilford (Harman) paper for like 35 years (I loved Kodak fineart :-( ) but I have never used the direct positive and I would love to stick that in my 8x10 wisner or even the Harman titan 8x10 Pen hole camera. But is is any good and what is its behavior like? Dlog curve Dmax dmin extra. I;m sure I will try some when I get done with this stupid movie but if anyone has experience with it.On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Inkjet or darkroom? Their darkroom papers are great and their inkjet papers are too. I normally do not print on Epson, but use Ilford.On Sep 1, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Randy Little wrote:Has anyone used the ilford positive papers?
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Art for Cars: art4carz.comStills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.
Art FaulThe Artist Formerly Known as Prints------Art for Cars: art4carz.comStills That Move: http://www.artfaul.comGreens: http://www.inkjetprince.comCamera Works - The Washington Post.