Yes and being lee it will last for a good long time vs cokin soft plastic
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message --------
From: asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 01/29/2013 10:13 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: cokin slide-in adapter for traditional lenses?
Thanks for the suggestion, Roy. I think I be asking for significant
vignetting by doing this, though.
It looks like Lee has sort-of the same idea with a ring for 110mm
filters*. It is round, though, and must be screwed in (!) to the lee
adapter. Of course, being Lee, the small thin ring of metal is $52.
It looks like I will have to try to fabricate one myself, perhaps out of a
cokin "lens cap", as a prototype.
Andrew
*
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/218398-REG/LEE_Filters_FP105_Accessory_Front_Thread_Adapter.html
On Tue, January 29, 2013 8:26 am, PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> After putting on the polarizer could you space out the distance to the
> Cokin holder by put in a step up adapter ring and then a step down adapter
> ring to give yourself space to turn the polarizer? You could also use
> several skylight filters as spacers.(even with the glass broken out). If
> you have an old polarizer you could break out the filter and put it next
> to the Cokin adapter so when you twist the working polarizer the Cokin
> filter would not turn. Roy
>
>
>
> In a message dated 1/28/2013 11:59:48 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> but I'd like to use the Cokin system for my ND grads, and a screw-in
> polarizer on the lens with the Cokin system in front of it is clumsy at
> best, unusable at worst.
>
>
>
>
