In the UNITED STATES its FELONY infringement if you want to be technical. You by saying it ok in the US would be as legally liable for the act by promoting the act.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:53 AM, karl shah-jenner <shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:44 AM
----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Little" <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students" <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: phree photoshop
are you accusing me in a public foruim of stealing? reread what I wrote before you go there.
No what glib you and other taken the same tact. Using a loop hole to steal.
And I think you mean 'breach copyright' rather than 'steal'
the lawful intent of the term stealing is deprivation, I could steal a car, leaving the owner deprived, ie, without a car. I can breach copyright by copying it, the lawful owner still has a copy - that's breach of copyright.
I assume a photographer would understand the difference but who's to say
k
