Re: Mixing digital photography with analog photography

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any idiot can press a button no matter the receptor...film or a digital sensor. 

People using film aren't inherently better because they use film and a more manual process.

People using digital aren't necessarily slackers. 

If you're an artist you approach your work with an artist's eye and an artist's heart no matter the medium. 

Hell, there's painters who think all photographers are taking the easy way out. 

This argument is getting as tedious as Mac vs. PC.

Lea


the better you look the more you see

On Sep 23, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Great news - but how exactly does it replicate the enlarger? The difference between digital and film is not simply the image receptor, it’s the whole process. Film takes concentration and time and digital is so simple any idiot can do it.


Jan Faul

On Sep 23, 2012, at 7:03 PM, Stephen Ylvisaker wrote:

Digital goes Retro

The above link is to an column talking about using digital technology to replicate analog techniques.


Stephen



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux