|
Hi
My website is now back after the host company withdrew front page support. I now compose in front page with the extensions switched off and upload using FTP. My Images is back with a record of several years of my photography going back to about 1954 when I was 12. There are gaps i the record because some files of negatives were taken from me because they were controversial and I would have loved to have them on the site. One set of three frames shows the lunar excursion module crossing the face of the moon just prior to its landing in 1969. It was published at the time and was used as a frontpiece of several "space travel" books in the 1970's. I think you may still view it in the science museum in South Kesington, London, UK. I donated the film to the museum. They copied it but my original was stolen with other images 1960-1969. I have now disposed of all my film photographs. Thus preventing more trouble. The image I captured of a "flying saucer" over houses in London, near my home was confinscated by some men in smart suits (black) MIB's who did not want the image known. However it was published at the time, and an image I took of a sex attack on Wimbledon common and another one of a murder on clapham common were also lost. Similarly the pictures I had of the wedding of my alleged father to my mother in 1941 were lost together with many other family images. My web site shows some images on the same camera roll but those are missing. (Mum said she also married Hitler and I am the son, born on Mars).. I once had papers relating to this but these were lost along with some of Hitler's propaganda pre-war books. You won't find these listed anywhere because all that was destroyed by the British. I had papers relating to some of Hitler's space travel projects but all of the stuff was taken from the house when the authorities attacked us and detained me. Mum had her brain cut out with a steel pin to silence her. That is why photographs of mum are important to me. However I will soon be disposing of these and her stories in my head so that when we die no trace will remain. That is the law. The pictures I took when I was serving in the British army were taken by the army but they are possibly on show in the British Imperial War Museum. I get no pension relating to my service and no trace is left to me. I have been told that my exploits in the army are on show there but my identity is hidden. It appears that someone does not want it known. Politics - politics. That is my photography. So my posts about doctors, pills and politics are revelant to my photography, after all I was hospitalised over my image of that flying saucer down Windermere Road near me. Oh - I have also photographed rape attacks and another murder. These were used in evidence so I lost them. But I don't want them anyway. You might find an image of a murder on my web site.... Dr Chris Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 21:38:38 +0100 From: chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: tablet PC history To: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I seem to be trouble wherever I go... Dr Chris > Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:37:50 -0400 > From: Gregory.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: tablet PC history > To: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I did not say that I felt Chris' posts should be blocked. That was Mark. > > Nor did I say Karl's non-photo based posts should be blocked. Nor did I say any of the other log term PF member's posts should be blocked even when they stray from photography. > > There are a few members here that have kept PF alive for many years and Dr Chris is one of them. > > Greg > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Hans Klemmer [mailto:hansklemmer@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 09:59 AM > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: tablet PC history > > Mark & Greg, > Personally I do look forward to Dr. Chris' notes on whatever his subject may be. I'ts a breath of fresh air that proves to all of us that we have lives and challenges away from being behind the camera. > > Hans > > On 3 Aug 2012, at 14:40, mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: RE: tablet PC history > > From: Gregory Fraser <Gregory.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, August 03, 2012 8:05 am > > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students > > <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> From: Christopher Strevens > >> ...I have just sat up and found that I am floudering in debt and I > > might have to work FOR money much as I hate this aspect of western > > culture. > > > > Just so you know, there are about 6,973,738,000 other people in the > > world who work for money. I don't want you to feel all alone. > > > > Not only that, but if you won't take care of yourself, who will? > > Anything someone or some organization gives you, can take it away and > > sooner or later probably will. Frankly I am totally amazed that the > > group has been this patient. Andy must be a saint. Your Drs and pills > > are not about photography. I would suspect most of us have at least > > some debt, and to pay it we work for money. Some might even be in debt > > for a camera. Some might have to go to work and use a camera. After a > > while they find that what they loved so much is now a chore. They have > > to do what they are told not what they want. > > > > It is my opinion that these types of post are inhibit the flow of posts > > about photography. This is a resource I find valuable and if the post > > were about photography, the no matter how off base I might think an idea > > to be, its valuable. A free exchange of ideas isn't just for the ideas > > with which you agree. I could take each of your points part by part and > > discuss them, but no one would want to hear that. This is a photography > > group Dr, and a political discussion from me is just as bad as from you. > > Just because no one responses to argue doesn't mean you have convinced > > them of anything or that they agree with you. Its much more likely they > > have just hit the ignore button. > > > |
