It appears the scanners thread has run its course so
I thank all of you who responded. The society budget will not
support some of the suggestions like an Imacon and I think their
needs are more simple anyway. I believe that I will suggest and
Epson combo flat-bed, film scanner like the V600 or V700 and a
used Coolscan. I can get them going with those and I don't mind
putting in time for them anyway. Thanks again folks now back to
sending in photos for the gallery. Don On 3/16/11 10:59 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Scanning is a black art. There's a LOT to learn, and I've found myself re-scanning stuff when I see what my old scans look like :-). For old, relatively large B&W negatives (sheet film, 120 roll film), you can get quite decent results with a good flatbed scanner -- currently I use an Epson V700. The V750 even supports fluid mounting, which unfortunately makes a considerable difference if you're going for top-quality results ("unfortunate" because it's extra cost and effort, and some extra risk to the original). You won't be getting everything possible out of the negative most likely, though. For 35mm film, I do not find the V700 at all satisfactory. It doesn't hold the film flat enough, for one thing. For this kind of very small film (I've scanned a bunch of 110, too, which is even smaller) a dedicated film scanner is significantly better. Both flatbeds and film scanners are quite slow. Almost anything will do for reflective (as opposed to transparent) originals; there's just not that much brightness range there. I haven't worked with larger originals. Larger flatbeds exist, and are priced accordingly :-( . I've been happy enough with the Nikon software on their Coolscan scanners (all discontinued now; but "old new stock" is still available, and used units are available). Remember, resolution is very rarely the thing a scanner is lacking. So don't be impressed by high resolution numbers. |