Re: museum collections? (now FOB)

[Lea Murphy <lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have really enjoyed this exchange of opinions and ideas.

I am inspired to go back to the museum in some spare time this afternoon and speak with a docent who might be able to explain to me why/how the photographs I was so intrigued by ended up on the walls. I will report back with what I learn.

I am completely self-taught in photography and have no education in 'art' which is to say I haven't studied it (sculpture, painting, textile, etc) like I've studied photography. I don't presume to know what makes great art but I do believe I have a pretty good sense of what makes a good photograph. What's hanging in the Kemper isn't even that. It's not a good photograph. I would be happy to accept a good photograph of a subject that challenges me but a bad photograph (lighting, angle) of mundane subject matter on a museum wall is worth questioning.

Not ten feet from the wedding photograph are three Steiglitz photographs and two Robert Mapplethorpes. In the same exhibit.

Andrew posted two links to podcasts by Brooks Jensen and they are very appropriate to this conversation I believe. Sometimes what we see hanging is nothing but poo and we've been blindsided to believing it must be good because it's hanging in a museum. I'm seeking to find out why the Kemper believed these two particular images (one of which I can't yet find a link to) good enough to purchase because I simply don't see it.

I'm open to learning, though. Update to follow...

Lea

On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:58 AM, mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Well for what its worth, I personally would like to commend the group.

Why?

No one has been personally insulted. (at least if anyone feels that I didn't take it that way)

No one has been called any names.

Though its clear there are a number of different views, everyone has kept it on an adult level regardless of age.

Though we may disagree, its been done with respect.

Says a lot for this group

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: museum collections? (now FOB)
From: Marilyn <marilyn160@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, January 27, 2011 6:07 am
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Might I ask, who here would put themselves voluntarily on an Arts selection
panel?" - Herschel
***

I would volunteer to be on a panel any time, Herschel. I see the
opportunities to study the thinking process of others, and understand to
some degree, why certain images are chosen, or not.

I am and have been involved in the editing and publishing of several writing
projects. I participate each year for the very reason I noted above. I
want to be on the panels to cheer on the entries I feel are worthy, and I
want to understand how something I deem as unacceptable, poor work, etc.,
etc., ends up being in the volume or, with art - on the wall. It's a
wonderful learning experience and allows me to broaden my perspective. In
either case, my mind isn't really changed much as far as to what I feel is
good and/or acceptable, but over the years I've learned to see from the
perspective of others, which I think is a good thing. And, in a few cases
I've come to respect a piece (art or writing) that I first felt isn't worthy
(in my humble opinion). So, I've grown.

In some cases I have a suspicion that "who you know" may have some sway, but
that's only a suspicion.

(I'm still puzzled as to why the Huntington would showcase Bukowski.)

Marilyn





-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Shah-Jenner
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:22 AM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: museum collections? (now FOB)

your kids . my camera . we'll click
www.leamurphy.com