RE: what a find - are they real?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



One way to be sure is to compare the edges of the negative images with the
edges of known ( read authentic ) Ansel Adams negatives.  
Negative carriers ( film holders ) over time get little nicks and dents and
these show up in the negative like a finger print.  If they find and exact
match, then the negative were made in AA's film holders and that lends
credence to him as the photographer.
Just a thought,
James

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Dyer-Bennet
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:13 PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
Subject: Re: what a find

I'm hearing it asserted online that the family (um, I mean Adams' family) is
denying that these are his work; but I can't find any reference to that more
authoritative than random people in mailing lists.  There's certainly no
mention of it on the major Adams web sites, or in articles Google News finds
me.
Unfortunately, both claims and denials may have more to do with jockeying
over money than with trying to determine if the pictures are really by
Adams.
If the pictures are in fact by Adams, and haven't been published before, it
seems like they're still in copyright, and the copyright would be owned by
his heirs (or somewhere the copyrights were formally transferred to;
copyrights cannot be transferred "informally"), which would seem to
interfere with publication by others.  However, if the family is actually
denying these are Adams' work, then presumably they can't claim copyright
ownership....
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux