Re: PHOTOFORUM digest 5439

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not at all. One third of the vertical does not mean one third of the
horizontal. In other words, the thirds do not have to be equidistant in
the composition, and indeed, quite often are not.

Andrew


On 6/14/2010, "PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx" <PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>Also doesn't the rule of thirds imply that the perfect picture should be
>square?
>Roy
>
>
>In a message dated 6/14/2010 3:24:21 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>danmdan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>I don't  need Google to tell me the rules - I'm a very old hand at
>photography and  rules are made to be broken ! As with my previous entry "Blue" the
>present  picture's editing was quite deliberate, as I felt both top and
>bottom sections  equally important. I'm now looking for subjects for "red" and
>"green".
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux