Seeing his photstream in flickr he may have just used a remote triggered camera, or a sound triggered camera.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:14 PM, <lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The guy's no slouch when it comes to triggered flash. None of the
critters here were stunt doubles:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jlrodriguez/
I think it would be very easy for him to show other takes of the jumping
wolf. Hard to believe it got it in one try.
AZ
LOOKAROUND - Since 1978
Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround E-Book
FREE COPY
http://www.panoramacamera.us
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [SPAM] Re: Photographer stripped of title
> From: David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, January 21, 2010 3:09 pm
> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Thu, January 21, 2010 13:31, Trevor Cunningham wrote:
> > John Palcewski wrote:
> >> It's extraordinary that any committee of judges would actually believe
> >> the photographer who claimed the image was made of a wild animal, on
> >> the fly, AND at night. Absurd on its face.
> > no doubt...untrained wolves keep their distance...i might be tricked
> > into believing it if the wolf were jumping away from the camera>>
> Have you people not seen the background on this discussion? It was
> supposedly done with an unattended camera setup and an automatic trigger.
> You seem to be suggesting the wolf would have acted differently in the
> presence of the photographer -- but the photographer was not present.
> --
> David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
> Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
> Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
> Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
