On Sat, December 19, 2009 15:27, michaelhughes7a@xxxxxxx wrote: > to attend to the spirit of the question could it be argued that because > neither the baby nor the parents are able to sue the photographer for any > mis-use of their images the photographer needs no release. There's probably somebody who has the right to sue now. However, regardless of that, the parents will be able to sue as early as next year (they are 17 now). So no safety there! -- David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
