You are welcome, Joy. He's all puppy - that's for sure.
Marilyn
----- Original Message -----
From: <lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: NY Times blog
John P.
Why is that sad? How could journalistic photography be anything but
illustration designed to support the text? Why publish anything without
a point of view? Bias is important to critical thought.
This is a neat book about photo journalism:
News Art: Manipulated Photographs from the Burns Archive
AZ
LOOKAROUND - Since 1978
Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround E-Book 5ed.
http://www.panoramacamera.us
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SPAM] Re: NY Times blog
From: John Palcewski <palcewski@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, October 26, 2009 11:52 am
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The sad thing is that the Times series hints that photographic "truth"
was
subject to manipulation from the beginning, mostly driven by a desire to
make money or suit some editorial or political purpose.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:43 AM, <lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Lea and John P,
>
> Thanks for the NYT series URL.
>
> There is a scenic stream my large format pals are fond of shooting that
> has some stones that seem to magically change position over time. Thy
> also hate utility lines and spend hours deleting them. Such fraud
> shouldn't be tolerated!
>
> It is a wonder in these cynical, digi-times how many still think photos
> are anything but illustrations.
> On the negative side, I often wonder about what will happen when the
> cultural memory of film is so dimmed the original photo mystique
> regarding "truth" and, to me, a large component of photographic art is
> lost.
>
> AZ
>
> LOOKAROUND - Since 1978
> Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
> The Lookaround E-Book 5ed.
> http://www.panoramacamera.us
>
>
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [SPAM] NY Times blog
> > From: Lea Murphy <lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sat, October 24, 2009 2:02 pm
> > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> > <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > I have found the first six parts of this seven part blog series
> > absolutely fascinating.
> > You may have to be a NY Times subscriber to access it (I am one so
> > I'm
> > not sure if this will work if you aren't one). It is worth
> > subscribing
> > to just for this article, I believe.
> >
> http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/the-case-of-the-inappropriate-alarm-clock-part-1/
> > It's been illuminating. To say the least.
> > Lea
> > babies. they're what i do.
> > www.leamurphy.com
>
>
