RE: Post card stamp for back of photographs

Rene Hales <Rene@xxxxxx> · Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:50:59 -0400

Title: Message

Rather than printing on the print back 
itself, I bet you could easily design and print on a label. They come in lots of 
sizes and then just stick it on the back of your print.

Rene

  -----Original Message-----
From: 
  owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  [mailto:owner-photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
  PhotoRoy6@xxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 8:42 
  PM
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - 
  Students
Subject: Re: Post card stamp for back of 
  photographs

  It worse than that. Printing on the back of gloss  RC paper can't be 
  done with dye or pigment inkjets. You also can't print with dye or pigment on 
  the back of commercial (scenic)postcards
  Roy.

  In a message dated 10/16/2009 3:28:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
  dd-b@xxxxxxxx writes:
  The back of the 
    paper isn't coated, so who knows with any given printer
whether you can 
    print on it decently or not?  And it's a much bigger pain
to fire up 
    the computer and printer and run something through than it is
to just hit 
    the back of a card with a stamp