Re: Camera question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Camera question
From: karl shah-jenner <shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:15:42 +0800
References: <4AA6AA34.2010902@xxxxxxxxxx> <p06240805c6cc5c5b5b77@[192.168.1.46]> <4e516fb1afc4204e6010b659d00a7e0d.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200909082026.BVB84549@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <026501ca30e1$50f52b60$0f00010a@LAN> <4AA7009D.90206@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Dyer-Bennet" 


: The camera is slightly bigger than the ones you mention, but the sensor 
: is FOUR TIMES the size.


gotta love a big sensor :)

References:
- Camera question
  - From: Don Roberts
- Re: Camera question
  - From: Emily L. Ferguson
- Re: Camera question
  - From: David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Camera question
  - From: Tina Manley
- Re: Camera question
  - From: karl shah-jenner
- Re: Camera question
  - From: David Dyer-Bennet

Prev by Date: Re: Camera question
Next by Date: Annie Leibovitz
Previous by thread: Re: Camera question
Next by thread: Re: Camera question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux