Definitely the video is a big deal but it's not the only big
deal about the 5DM2.
I can't compare it to the 50D because I've only got a 5D.
Here's what I like about the M2:
21.5 million pixels: the clarity is amazing
ISO to 6400: and it's really useable
Much improved menu system: much easier, clearer to navigate
Automatic sensor cleaner: does a good job
Full frame: need I say more?
The M2 may be overkill for some people and indeed, I use mine as
my carryaround camera because it would be overkill for my studio work
with babies.
What prompted me to buy was that I wanted the newer body, the
greater number of pixels and I won't ever go back to anything less than
full frame.
I hope this is of some help to you.
Lea
life is short. photograph it.
Lea, I'm trying to decide on a replacement for my 20D with two
under
consideration: 50D, 5D MkII.
I read a recent review from B&H of the 5D MkII and it seemed to me
that the big thing about it is the video.
My question to you as a user of both is how big a deal is the video
capability of the MkII? I'm really not that interested in video. What
do you like about the MkII vs the original?
Thanks,
Bob
Lea Murphy wrote:
I
have a dedicated 5D and lens in my studio.
I removed the lens, put it on my 5DM2,
/////
( O O )
--------------------oOOO-----O----OOOo-----73 de w8imo@xxxxxxxx------
I plan to live forever. So far, so good......