|
Indeed...I was going by memory on that one. I guess sine JM's
homoerotic images got a lot of press around the same time as this one,
and sexuality being a much hotter topic than religion, the original
author gets lost in the mix (subsequently, I've found a number of
Google references that make the same mistake). That's too bad. This
being a home pregnancy test, I thought the presence of urine was a
little obvious...oh well, can't win every time! Thanks for the comment
and correction, I like that you're always straight to the point. Mark Harris wrote:
|
