RE: Interesting (scary) article. -straining at a gnat

[herschel <herschel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You’re inferring that this kind of restriction on liberties couldn’t happen where you live right??

Where DO you live?

 

herschel

 

 

I didn't discuss it because it was about the 3rd time I had seen reference to the story. As I don't live in England there's not a whole lot I can do about the treatment of photographers there. However, if I get a chance to visit I'll keep in mind what my rights are there, as well as what I might expect should I ever be questioned about practicing the innocent act of photographing.

 

Back in early March I posted this spoof in a couple places:

http://img.skitch.com/20080420-ptqde8krswi5tf4tmbdm2ybqsh.jpg

 

It's challenging to deal with human nature.

 

Rich

 

 

On Apr 19, 2008, at 7:52 PM, MichaelHughes7A@xxxxxxx wrote:

and swallowing a camel.

The picture of the camera was irrelevant in the context of the article in question

and the ensuing thread - though not without some interest - deflected attention from the basic message in the article.

Not quite like re -arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic

Michael