Re: simple question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 10:31 AM -0600 11/25/07, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
(In my personal opinion, life + 70 is grossly excessive; in particular, lots of work that's still in copyright, you can't find the owner for, so it's essentially taken out of the marketplace. Only major corporate properties and "best-sellers" can you routinely find the rights owner for anywhere near that long after the death of the artist. And the uncertainty of the "life +" part makes it very hard to tell when something can be used without finding the rights holder.)

And for the other side, in my personal opinion copyright should never expire, like property ownership, it should be subject to all the vagaries of property managment. Why do you want to use something that belongs to someone else without recompense?

Since when do we value the ability to accumulate money more than the ability to create music, poetry, prose, art, photography? And why should money be more transferable through the generations than the results of our creative energies?

If people wish to use my creative energies and their results they can pay a fee, which they can negotiate with me or my heirs. Why should they be able to just use it without honoring its value? They can't just walk into my house when I'm gone and take up residence, or drive my car off the lot when I'm gone.

The whole reason copyright seems so onerous is because creators have succumbed to the pressures of licensing schemes perpetrated by obnoxious recreators like Disney, not to mention the publishing industry as a whole. Those people know how valuable that stuff is and force work-for-hire contracts, or outright purchase contracts on unwitting creators. If the creators all insisted on the actual value of their creations they would not be so ripped off and perhaps they would be forming licensing organizations to manage their contracts.

Unfortunately that is not happening and every fool who fills up flikr with their cute pix is contributing to the commoditization of their creative efforts. Check the contracts you agree to by clicking that button on those sites. They all lay claim to reuse and often to license use of your deposits without any payments to you, and generally without your even knowing.


--
Emily L. Ferguson
mailto:elf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
508-563-6822
New England landscapes, wooden boats and races
http://www.landsedgephoto.com
http://e-and-s.instaproofs.com/


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux