> You sound very cynical to me. Well, as long as I don't have to choose a new epitaph... Again! :) > The line is quite > clear--only global > changes to correct (not enhance) color and tonality. I consider color as "content" Pictures of people in a darkroom or inside a submarine come to mind, the ambience heavily red or green. Color is a crucial part of the story, hence "content". > If you want to get into a > philosophical discussion of what is "flawed by > nature" you'll have to > take that up with someone else. Well, inevitably this subject will have to be settled that way, since ethics and any argument of reason are the realm of philosophy. I am aware of the severe scalding that has resulted to others in this forum for defending their philosophical positions! I thought of writing an article and maybe talk A. D. Coleman into publishing it. No, wait... :) I know the value of good reputation, and If PJ's adhere to a set of rules, it is great that they have a code - it favors their argument. For me, ethics in photography is always eluding universal validation. Cheers! ********************** www.alberto-tirado.com johnploy.blogspot.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
