Truth in photojournalism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taped to my computer at the newspaper that I work for is an excerpt from the 
National Press Photographers Associastion (NPPA) bylaws it reads: 
"As journalists, we believe that credibility is our greatest asset.  In 
documentary photojournalism, it is wrong to alter the content of a 
photograph in any way (electronically or in the darkroom) that deceives the 
public.  We believe the guidelines for fair and accurate reporting should be 
the criteria for judging what may be done electronically to a photograph."

That is very cut and dried to me.  We color correct and size our photos.  We 
also dodge and burn, but that is NOT altering the CONTENT of a photograph.  
Erasing someone's legs IS altering the content, it does not matter if that 
content is relevant to the photo or not (and don't even get me started on 
adding a puck or ball!).
If you were there, and you knew that someone was standing there, and the 
legs were no longer visible, how could you ever believe what you see in the 
paper again?  I think our readers need to trust that what they see in the 
paper is what was there.  I have always looked at my job as being the eyes 
for those who cannot be there...to show you exactly what I see and how I see 
it.....

Angi Turnpaugh
Pharos-Tribune Staff Photographer
(574)722-5000 ext 5152



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux