Re: high enough frame rates?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: high enough frame rates?
From: Howard <home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:36:40 +0100
In-reply-to: <008801c77aa4$9f37adc0$0f00010a@LAN>
References: <4619298D.8080400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <004301c77a17$dcccbc30$0400a8c0@ducklaptop> <461956B3.90706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <005b01c77a23$af33cc80$0400a8c0@ducklaptop> <008801c77aa4$9f37adc0$0f00010a@LAN>
Reply-to: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070222 SeaMonkey/1.1.1

A mere snip of a bargain - shall I pre-order 2 or 3?  :-\

Howard

karl

shah-jenner wrote:

http://red.com/cameras.htm

12Mpixels at 60 fps.. in RAW

the cine guys are moving fast!

k

References:
- Colour Processing and Grain
  - From: Howard
- RE: Colour Processing and Grain
  - From: Don Feinberg
- Re: Colour Processing and Grain
  - From: Howard
- RE: Colour Processing and Grain
  - From: Don Feinberg
- high enough frame rates?
  - From: karl shah-jenner

Prev by Date: high enough frame rates?
Next by Date: postcard project update...opinions needed
Previous by thread: high enough frame rates?
Next by thread: postcard project update...opinions needed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

Powered by Linux