A posting on slashdot comments on Lightroom vs Aperture:
Nonu writes "Adobe has officially released its Aperture killer, Lightroom, and the reviews are starting to come in
.
Ars looks at Lightroom and concludes that it's a better choice for
those without bleeding-edge hardware. 'Aperture's main drawback is
still performance as it was designed for bleeding-edge machines. On a
quad Core 2 Duo Xeon, it is very usable but Lightroom just feels faster
for everything regardless of hardware. Since Aperture relies on Core
Image and a fast video card to do its adjustments (RAW decoding is done
by the CPU), it's limited to what the single 3-D card can do. Lightroom
does everything with the CPU and so it is likely to gain more speed as
multicore systems get faster.'"
I am interested on your comments on the comments:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?threshold=-1&mode=nested&commentsort=0&op=Change&sid=223426
--
Alex Georgiadis
georgiadis.googlepages.com
