Re: Watt-seconds in flash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My new meter has a switch that says photons per square milimter, how does that work.....





Les
(hehe)

-----Original Message-----
>From: Roger Eichhorn <eichhorn@xxxxxx>
>Sent: Feb 8, 2007 9:22 PM
>To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Watt-seconds in flash
>
>No!  Watt-seconds is just that.  Watts times seconds.  It's a measure  
>of the amount of energy released.  A watt is a rate -- energy per  
>second.  Multiply that for the duration  in seconds to get the total  
>energy release.  For example, you buy electricity by the Kilowatt- 
>hour.  But perhaps you mis-spoke.  The rest of your commentary seems  
>to be correct.
>
>Roger
>
>On Feb 8, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Herschel Mair wrote:
>
>> Hi Lea,
>>
>> The WS (or Joules) specification used in studio flashes is a little  
>> misleading.
>>
>> It's really a measure of electricity and not light. One  
>> manufacturer's  500WS  light may put out much more or less light  
>> than another's.
>>
>>
>> It's useful for comparing lights  in a single manufacturer though  
>> and you can be pretty sure that the Elinchrom 400WS light will give  
>> you twice the light output of the Elinchrom 200WS.
>>
>>
>> What you really need is the guide number (GN) with the umbrella or  
>> light shaper you will be using.
>>
>>
>> When thinking of watt-seconds,  think of   "WATTS PER SECOND"
>>
>>
>> A 500W tungsten lamp will give you, let's say,  f/11 at 1 second  
>> exposure. (500 WS)
>>
>> A 250W tungsten light should give you f/8 at 1 second under the  
>> same circumstances (250WS)
>>
>>
>> etc.,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Herschel Mair
>> Head of the Department of Photography,
>>
>> Higher College of Technology
>> Muscat
>> Sultanate of Oman
>>
>> Adobe Certified instructor
>>
>>
>>
>> + (986) 99899 673
>>
>>
>>
>> www.herschelmair.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: lea murphy <lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students  
>> <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Friday, February 9, 2007 4:06:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: Elinchrom Studio Set
>>
>> I'd buy it in a hearbeat. Elinchrom is some of the best lighting  
>> you can buy.
>>
>> The heads are the lights themselves and 250 and 400 is the watts  
>> per second the lights can output. There's all sorts of technical  
>> stuff to explain it (and hopefully someone will) but one way to  
>> think of it is that it is like a guide number for your studio  
>> lights. Basically, the higher the number the more power and the  
>> faster recycling time.
>>
>> This will be more than sufficient for studio work though you may,  
>> in time, wish to add a third light and softboxes instead of umbrellas.
>>
>> Good for you and good luck.
>> Lea
>>
>> On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Elson T. Elizaga wrote:
>>
>>> I'm planning to buy this set:
>>>
>>> http://www.ebay.ph/viItem?ItemId=150089965064
>>>
>>> What is 250 and 400 in the phrase "2 heads: 1x250 and 1x400"?
>>>
>>> Watts? What do you think of the whole set in general? Is it  
>>> sufficient for portraits? Food and jewelry photography?
>>>
>>> I'm not a studio photographer so some things in this area are  
>>> still baffling to me.
>>>
>>> I've asked the seller already, but I'd like to get your opinion, too.
>>>
>>> Elson
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> lea murphy
>> www.leamurphy.com
>> www.whinydogpress.com
>> blog: web.mac.com/leamurphy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
>> in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
>



[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux