|
I think the advantage of the histogram is that it can help you
fine tune your exposure, if I where shooting JPGs I would definatly use the
histogram, but RAW files do have latitude, to be honest I only use my histogram
to double check my exposure looking at the over all image, I never pay much
attention to the blinking high lights.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:22
PM
Subject: Re: blown highlights?
So are we not supposed to trust our histograms anymore?
If not, what's the purpose of using them?
Lea
On Oct 10, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Mair's Photography wrote:
That
is the beauty of RAW files, there is a lot of information recorded for those
high lights, and that is the one place where Adobe raw converter also
shines.
----- Original Message
-----
Sent:
Tuesday, October 10, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: blown
highlights?
I'm confused.
Some shots show blown highlights in my histogram on my Canon 20D but
when I pull then into Photoshop RAW converter I can adjust them so the
highlights aren't blown at all.
What gives?
I thought blown highlights meant there was no data in the highlights
but indeed, I have plenty of info when I make a little exposure
adjustment.
Am I just lucky or is this normal?
Lea
lea murphy
www.leamurphy.com
www.whinydogpress.com
lea murphy
www.leamurphy.com
www.whinydogpress.com
|
