Elgenper wrote:
I owned, used, and loved the 28-135 when I used a Canon D60. Today,
if I went with Canon, I would choose the 24-105 IS instead; it seems
to be noticeably sharper, it is somewhat wider, it has constant
aperture, and it is about the same bulk and weight.
BTW, I didn´t "go with Canon" this time; I bought a Nikon D200 and the
Nikon 18-200 VR. This lens is noticeably better than the Canon
28-135, in spite of the vastly increaded range. But that´s beside the
point for a Canon owner; the thing is that lens design seems to have
gone forward since that 28-135 was conceived, and the Canon 24-105 is
a newer generation, and shows it..
But I had no issues with my 28-135 at the time. I t was OK optically,
and very convenient to carry as a sole lens.
Regards,
Per
I don't like people who've got the Nikon 18-200 VR - hate hate hate!!!!
I ordered mine in FEBRUARY and still haven't got it. Nobody in the U.K.
seems to have it. All on back order...
WHERE ARE THE DAMN THINGS!!!
(Sorry Per - didn't really mean it.... :-D )
Howard
