Re: Liquid pixels (was Re: Film holder?)

fotofx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx · Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:36:43 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

In the afforementioned WPI or wet pixel method you use electronic tweezers (after you fish it out of the drink) to place each individual pixel (wet of course) on the proper substrate. Of course microshocks are always an issue so a #6 groundstrip is needed to make sure that you are not carrying any excess static energy. The pixels are 
positivly charged and the substrate is of course negative ground.

Please see my online manual at www.bselectrons.haha
Of course this can only be done with the latest software 

You see Guy the stuff you started.. :-)  DOH

Les

-----Original Message----- 
From: Guy Glorieux 
Sent: Jul 13, 2006 3:20 PM 
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students 
Subject: Re: Liquid pixels (was Re: Film holder?) 

Hi Rushi,
Don't listen to anything I say.
This is all pure invention.
Just a joke!
Sorry if I raised your interest in vain.
Best regards,
Guy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: rush rouge 
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students 
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Liquid pixels (was Re: Film holder?)

hi ..
U r getting me intrested in what U have to say.
But i didn't get much of it..
Will u pls explain it for a novice like me..
regards
rushi

On 7/12/06, Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

Just a quick footnote to my earlier email on the subject.

Liquid pixel imaging (LPI) is not to be confused with WPI (wet pixel imaging).
The later can easily be acheived by throwing your computer in the lake (or the bathtub if you live in the city).  The former requires an actual meltdown of the computer.

Of course, WPI is more washed (so to speak!) compared to the saturation of LPI.

Regards,

Guy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Guy Glorieux 
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students 

Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 10:17 PM
Subject: Liquid pixels (was Re: Film holder?)

Hi Alan,

Liquid pixel imaging (LPI) is truly beautiful.
It does require a fair bit of practice and few have really mastered it.

Liquid pixels normally come from a meltdown of your computer.
This can be rather tricky to orchestrate and is not recommended unless you are quite familiar with each and every step of the process.
Make sure you do a full data backup beforehand.

I don't suppose that this is the right forum to get into an extensive discussion, but I'd be glad to hear if anyone wants to share their experience.

Regards,

Guy

P.S.  For more information, check "The LightRoom Cookbook - Re-engineering ancient processes in the age of digital imaging", Chapter 5, pp236-40.  Don't miss the footnote at the bottom of p238.  It is absolutely critical.
The book is hard to find and the description of the processes leave a lot to be desired.  But it's a good starting point to experiment.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: lookaround360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students 
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:58 PM
Subject: RE: Film holder?

Gy,

Why does that almost seem plausible?  BTW Marilyn - get a 4X5 picture frame, the plastic snap-in glass type (MCS Industries) and use the single weight glass.  Regular glass is too thick.

Build a 120/35mm Lookaround!
The Lookaround Book.
Now an E-book.
http://www.panoramacamera.us