Re: ISO in digital capture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:57:41 +0200, Veli Izzet <veli.izzet@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote/replied to:

>This relates to only RAW capture: 
>
>As we can rather freely adjust tonality values in RAW decoders, would it be
>better to use the tonality adjustments of RAW decoders and leave the ISO
>setting of the Camera at the lowest value, or should we try to use the best
>ISO setting in bortherline cases.
>
>I somewhat tend to use ISO100, and then maybe add up to two stops, instead
>of using IS0 400 right at the start; and I wonder if this is a wise or dumb
>thing to do.

I start at ISO 400 and work up. Never seem to get enough light for less.

I only bump up the exposure in post processing when I goofed up.

Shoot it the best you can, then tweak it later.

-- 
Jim Davis, Owner, Eastern Beaver Company:
http://easternbeaver.com/ Motorcycle Relay Kits,
Powerlet, Posi-Lock, Parts, Info, Photos
K100RSes on both sides of the planet!


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux