Greg, RE rights grabbing - how do you mean? I don't have a cell camera. Are the pics JPEG's or what? Once they are sent does the phone company claim rights to them in their fine print? RE security, it seems to me that a computer could screen a few million pics a minute to identify "sensitive" subjects and would be more useful than verbal phone chatter. Also, did you ever wonder what constitutes the "suspicious" behavior we're supposed to be watching for? Did anyone watch the SON speech? :-) AZ Build a Lookaround! The Lookaround Book, 4Th ed. Now an E-book. http://www.panoramacamera.us > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: govt spys, was Are you a Yahoo! group member? > From: Greg Stempel <fyrframe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, January 31, 2006 6:10 pm > To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students > <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> > The AdCritic thing is the bomb! I mean, it's not really a b**b. It's > uh, Way Cool! > > Just to get back on topic - do ya suppose NSA monitors cell phone photo > traffic? Could a jpeg be construed (in some twisted Bushey way) as > separate from protected speech? Are cell phone picture's "native" > telecommunications mode off the Internet?<<<< > > One other thing to keep in mind is the amzing amount of "rights grabbing" > going on! > > > Take care, > Gregory david Stempel > F I R E F R A M E i m a g i n g > www.americanphotojournalist.com > www.soundexposure.org
