And if you've already read the post from its beginning what difference does
it make if any thing is trimmed or not?
Terry L. Mair
Mair's Photography
158 South 580 East
Midway, Utah 84049
435-654-3607
www.mairsphotography.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "James B. Davis" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 6:33 PM
Subject: Post-topping
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:19:38 +0800, karl shah-jenner
<shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote/replied to:
Emily L. Ferguson writes:
You know, Terry. "Thanks, Per." would have quite enough.
Would have quite enough...what?
makes a bit more sense
Makes sense. Trouble with top posting is same as it always has been -
people
forget to trim what's down at the bottom. If a top poster trims then I
don't
care. But they don't. And that's a fact.
--
It indicates the quality of the logic?
A: It is contrary to logical thought
Q: Why is top posting bad?
Jim Davis - http://easternbeaver.com/
