RE: Would you give away a print to a prospective client?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 03:50 PM 11/13/2005, fotofx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Really. So How do I prevent and undercut or freebie from another photographer when I find out after the fact?

You can't. But how can BestBuy deal with it when Circuit City undercuts them with a one-day "manager's sale" and they find out after the fact? This is basic marketing, it's not specific to photography, and it's something you live with. It's not like it's new. It's just business, and if you can't deal with it, then you have to find something else to do.


So If I gain access to your boxing matches shoot from same vantage point as you with equal skills you won't mind if I follow you around and give away my images to all of your clients. You are banking your statement on one image.

I've sold plenty of images from boxing. This happens to be one where I have probably lost income because of unlicensed usage, I give it as an example of things that I find truly onerous as opposed to things that just happen in business. But I've done the business things that will make it harder for other people to sell to my clients. I have relationships with the boxers and with the gyms. I give a print from each fight to the boxers, but the gyms have to pay. They call me when they want something, they get me the access, and they send other people my way. This last point is really important - the largest single image sale I have came from a boxer referring a company to me for a photo to go with a testimonial. He could have told them to send a photographer out, which might have been cheaper, but he referred them to me for one of my existing images because I have the relationship with him.

A lot of things are changing because of technology. A lot of photographers are upset that anyone with a digital camera can shoot a photo and know they got it. Photographers don't like to admit it, but one of the things they used to get paid for was "getting" the shot. With film, you wouldn't know for a day or two, so clients wanted someone they knew would bring them the photo. The quality of the image mattered far less than most photographers thought, or would admit. To the client, it was just having a photo. Now, with digital, the (former) client doesn't need a professional photographer. They can do it them self because they know from the screen if they got it. Real estate pictures are a good example of this - most agents shoot their own photos now for the MLS. It's gone, so photographers have to move on.




Jeff Spirer
Photos: http://www.spirer.com
One People: http://www.onepeople.com/
Surfaces and Marks: http://www.withoutgrass.com

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux