Maybe the butter has slid off my noodles but I miss the point of
this post.
SteveS wrote:
Oh yeah, about EK (Eastman Kodak)? It's owned at 97% by institutions.
What does that reallty mean? What institutions?
NONE of which are art institutions, by the way.
Why does art matter here?
Why don't any of you own a share or two? Maybe for one of the three
reasons it's going away from traditional B&W photography materials.
1. Can't afford it.
2. Never used it.
3. Don't really care.
S.
Sorry, but I miss the point here also. Would you please expand on
these items? Why just B&W? Why does my share ownership matter? It
is publicly traded on the NYSE.
Don
--
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are
always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
-Bertrand Russell, philosopher, mathematician, author, Nobel
laureate (1872-1970)
