Re: file share vs tape as gift

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Maxey" <written_by@xxxxxxx>
To: "List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students"
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: file share vs tape as gift


>>>What is the difference between file share and making a tape of your
favorite music and giving it to your friend as a gift? You're not making
money that belongs to the originator. No, I'm not dumb. Just looking for
some comments.>>>




the year Napster came online, record companies experienced the highest
sales increase *in history*, not that they liked that information put
around.

since then they've seen a gradual decline, but it still hasn't dropped to
the level of pre-napster days..


much like radio - people hear music, people BUY music and although the
execs wanted to put the massive sales down to their skill, it was largely
due to napster and other P2P programs.

I know  many people who've downloaded music they've never heard before on a
whim - especially stuff that gets no airplay and then gone out and bought
the album.

Filesharing music has also proved a very effective way for unsigned bands
to get heard, and even signed bands still choose to put free clips on the
web for folks to download.

who loses?

the record companies don't, the artists don't, the customers don't.

Local libries are plentiful here in Oz, all paid for by local taxes.

Bookshops do a roaring trade in books

all the willing reader has to do is go down the road to any public library
and they could have the book for free, but hey - they want to own it.

k


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux