At 04:43 AM 6/11/2005, you wrote:
And we´re all supposed to bow down in humiliation before this
irrefutable proof that digital is junk, and we should all go out and
buy Speed Graphics...
Actually you have done exactly what K hoped when he slow trolled the list
with that enticing bit of info-bait.
..............Quite a few of us are happy with digital. Then,
ple--eze, let us shoot that!
I don't see how K can interfere in any way with anyone shooting digital.
After all, he and I both know that any fool with a digital camera can under
cut him right out of business.
out of the blue, someone who has no connection with this group just
sent me
a link to this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/technology/circuits/08schiesel.html? ex=12
75883200&
k
I was amazed when an individual, whose very existence I was unaware of,
directed me to this link:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-6468-7844
".....Majoli is satisfied with the images his point-and-shoots make, and so
are his clients, he says."
"In the beginning there was a general problem with digital, not with my
specific camera. But you can actually say that I have shot for National
Geographic [with the point-and-shoots]. We just do it and show the prints,
and they forget about [what camera was used]."
Dave
East Englewood
---------------------------
The proof is in the print. Let me reiterate for those who are troubled by
the concept.
The proof is in the print!
