RE: Bad Digital

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guys,

I woke up in the middle of the night thinking about what to do with all
my film and darkroom gear now that it is about worthless. I'm told
schools won't take it. I'll not likely do anything but ink-jet prints
from now on.  I got to wondering what film camera,  besides my panorama
cams, I'd want if I only had one. I guess an all-mechanical 35mm makes
the most sense. Some are speculating on Hassy's - the theory is an
affordable digital back for them is likely to show up.

There is nothing equivalent to a traditional black and white
photographic print in any format - so what?

AZ


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Bad Digital
> From: Gregory david Stempel <fyrframe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, April 09, 2005 1:06 pm
> To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
> <photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >>>
> You can say digital does not have the resolution of film. It will have 10
> times that tomorrow<<<
>
> And still, it will require a proprietary bucket of power, and several
> thousand dollars to own it.
>
> >>>>
> You can say it doesn?t have the same latitude but, tomorrow it will have
> more latitude than you eye. <<<<
>
> And still, it will require a proprietary bucket of power, and several more
> thousand dollars to own that.
>
> And still, no one cries foul.
>
> Take care,
> Gregory david Stempel
> FIREFRAMEi m a g i n g
> www.americanphotojournalist.com
> www.soundexposure.org


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux